Emporia ESIRC

Different Conflict-Resolution Strategies between Americans and Lebanese: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

ESIRC/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Haidar, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-11T19:44:48Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-11T19:44:48Z
dc.date.created March 1, 2013 en_US
dc.date.issued 2013-07-11
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3266
dc.description.abstract In this study, I investigated the differences between a Western and a Middle Eastern sample of employees in their supervisory conflict handling styles. I also examined employees’ intention for organizational exit, tenure, age and size of organization. Statistical findings validate that supervisory conflict is positively related to employee turnover intention and that integrative conflict management styles such as problem-solving and compromise are preferred over other strategies in both nations. Finally, this study also found a noticeable difference between the amount of conflict experienced by the two groups and their differing preferences for the use of “forcing” in concession. . en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Conflict-Resolution Strategies en_US
dc.subject Cross-Cultural Comparisons en_US
dc.subject Lebanese en_US
dc.subject Americans en_US
dc.title Different Conflict-Resolution Strategies between Americans and Lebanese: A Cross-Cultural Comparison en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.college the teachers college en_US
dc.advisor George Yancey en_US
dc.department psychology en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record