Emporia ESIRC

A comparison of two body composition tests: the 3-site skinfold and the 2-3 girth measurements.

ESIRC/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Savourdos, George
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-05T20:08:54Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-05T20:08:54Z
dc.date.created 1993 en_US
dc.date.issued 2012-07-05
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1769
dc.description 82 leaves en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this thesis was to determine the accuracy of the 2-3-Girth test and the 3-site Skinfolds when applied to non-weight trained males and females and to weight trained males. Underwater weighing was used as a criterion against which the 2-3-Girth and 3-site Skinfold tests were compared. The 3-site Skinfolds uses measurements of the chest, abdomen and thigh for men and triceps, ilium and thigh for women. The 2-3-Girth test uses measurements of the neck and lower abdomen for men and neck, upper abdomen and hip for women. A Pearson correlation and a t-test were used to analyze the data with a level of significance at 0.01 (two tail). The analysis of the results indicated that the 2-3-Girth test can predict percent of fat accurately for both groups of men. The 3-site Skinfolds significantly underestimated percent of fat in both male groups. In the women the Skinfolds had accurate results, but for the Girth test the results were inconclusive since the researcher obtained a very low correlation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Body composition-Measurement. en_US
dc.title A comparison of two body composition tests: the 3-site skinfold and the 2-3 girth measurements. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.college other en_US
dc.advisor Mark Stanbrough en_US
dc.department health, physical education and recreation en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record