Emporia ESIRC

The revolt of the generals:army opposition to the new look.

ESIRC/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bailey, Regena M.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-06-20T22:18:48Z
dc.date.available 2012-06-20T22:18:48Z
dc.date.created 1998 en_US
dc.date.issued 2012-06-20
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1390
dc.description iv, 140 leaves en_US
dc.description.abstract Why did Generals Matthew Ridgway, Maxwell Taylor, and James Gavin oppose New Look? Why did these professional officers end their careers over a disagreement with the Eisenhower administration concerning defense policy? Did a connection exist between those distinguished officers and their views of defense policy in the 1950s? Why did Eisenhower support New Look? Whom had a better understanding of American defense needs at the time, the president or his former lieutenants? Likewise, why did Admiral Arthur Radford and General Nathan Twining support President Eisenhower? It is the purpose of my thesis to answer those questions in an examination of Dwight Eisenhower's defense policy in the 1950s from available archival material and secondary sources. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Ridgway, Matthew. en_US
dc.subject Taylor, Maxwell D. (Maxwell Davenport), 1901-1987. en_US
dc.subject Gavin, James M. (James Maurice), 1907-. en_US
dc.subject Radford, Arthur William. en_US
dc.subject Twining, Nathan F. (Nathan Farragut), 1897-1982. en_US
dc.subject Eisenhower, Dwight D. (Dwight David), 1890-1969. en_US
dc.subject United States-Defenses. en_US
dc.title The revolt of the generals:army opposition to the new look. en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.college las en_US
dc.advisor Christopher Lovett en_US
dc.department social sciences en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record